Intro
Menu

Which Crypto Casinos Players Actually Withdraw From

crypto casino withdrawals

Which Crypto Casinos Players Actually Withdraw From

$5.28B moved into 24 crypto casinos over 90 days. $4.68B moved back out. That’s the topline from our latest on-chain deposit and withdrawal pull, tracked wallet by wallet across ETH and TRX, verifiable on Etherscan and Tronscan the same way our instant withdrawal rankings are.

Twelve of those 24 casinos have a payout ratio we can actually publish. The other twelve don’t, and the reason why turned out to be the more interesting half of this research.


One Casino Accounts for More Than Half of Everything We Tracked

Stake alone processed $2.70B in deposits and $2.66B in withdrawals in the 90-day window, 51.1% of all deposit value and 56.9% of all withdrawal value across the entire 24-casino set. Put another way, the other 23 casinos combined don’t add up to Stake on its own.

That’s simply the shape of the market right now. Everything else in this piece, the payout ratios, the chain splits, the withheld casinos, sits inside a market where one operator moves more volume than everyone else put together.


The 12 Verifiable Payout Ratios Sit Within Eight Points of Each Other

Payout ratio is withdrawals as a share of deposits. Of the 12 casinos where we can publish it, the range runs from 97.3% (MetaWin) to 105.2% (Acebet), tight for a market this size.

Casino Payout ratio
MetaWin 97.3%
Winna 97.4%
Duelbits 97.9%
Stake 98.6%
Rainbet 99.1%
Yeet 99.1%
Duel 99.7%
BetFury 99.8%
Thrill 100.0%
Shuffle 100.2%
Chips.gg 104.3%
Acebet 105.2%

Two of these, Acebet and Chips.gg, show withdrawals slightly exceeding deposits inside this specific window. Deposits made just before the window opened can still be withdrawn during it, nudging the ratio past 100%, ordinary timing overlap rather than anything to worry about. We only treat a ratio as implausible outside a much wider band, roughly 75% to 115%, and both sit comfortably inside it.

One caveat worth repeating from our own methodology: treat payout ratio as a sanity signal, not a trust score. A casino at 97% is just as healthy as one at 100%, the number simply isn’t precise enough to separate the two.


Tron Carries More Deposit Value Than Ethereum, Almost Entirely Because of One Casino

Across the 24 casinos, TRX deposits total $2.76B against ETH’s $2.53B, a real lead for Tron. But ETH is tracked at every single casino in this dataset, while TRX is only tracked at a subset. Strip out Stake’s $2.06B in TRX deposits, nearly three-quarters of all TRX value in the dataset, and Ethereum pulls comfortably ahead. Tron’s lead traces back to one casino’s chain preference, nothing broader in the market.


Twelve Casinos Don’t Get a Payout Ratio, and Withholding It Is the Point

The other 12 casinos in this dataset, Roobet, 1Win, Gamdom, BC.Game, Razed, Dicey, Rollbit, Gamba, Whale.io, Qzino, Housebets, and JackpotBet, don’t have a publishable payout ratio. The reason comes down to measurement, we can’t track their outflow accurately enough to say anything meaningful about it.

Most of them come down to one specific gap: no withdrawal wallet tracked on the chains we cover. That’s an important distinction. Unmeasured is not the same as zero. If we published a net flow for a casino with no tracked withdrawal wallet, it would read as close to 100% retention, in effect, “this casino never pays anyone out.” That’s false, and publishing it anyway would actively mislead readers, a worse outcome than simply leaving a gap. So we withhold the figure instead of guessing.

A few of the 12 have a second issue on top, incomplete history, meaning less than 95% of the 90-day window has usable data on at least one chain. BC.Game, Rollbit, and Whale.io fall here, backfill collection is underway and their numbers should firm up in a future pull.

Roobet is the one genuine outlier. It has a withdrawal wallet tracked, but the resulting net flow, -16.6%, sits outside even our wide plausible band. That points to flow moving through wallets or chains outside our coverage, most likely, rather than a genuine payout shortfall.


The Full Picture

Casino Deposits Withdrawals Payout ratio
Stake $2.70B $2.66B 98.6%
Roobet $464.0M $541.3M Withheld, outside plausible band
Rainbet $383.1M $379.5M 99.1%
Shuffle $374.8M $375.6M 100.2%
Duel $293.3M $292.4M 99.7%
1Win $270.7M Not tracked Withheld, no withdrawal wallet
Gamdom $235.0M Not tracked Withheld, no withdrawal wallet
BC.Game $187.7M $142.5M Withheld, incomplete history
Thrill $88.1M $88.1M 100.0%
Yeet $67.5M $66.9M 99.1%
Razed $41.8M Not tracked Withheld, no withdrawal wallet
Duelbits $34.5M $33.8M 97.9%
Dicey $28.5M Not tracked Withheld, no withdrawal wallet
MetaWin $27.8M $27.0M 97.3%
Rollbit $23.8M $26.6M Withheld, incomplete history
BetFury $19.9M $19.9M 99.8%
Gamba $13.8M Not tracked Withheld, no withdrawal wallet
Acebet $10.5M $11.1M 105.2%
Whale.io $6.4M $6.3M Withheld, incomplete history
Qzino $5.7M Not tracked Withheld, no withdrawal wallet
Housebets $3.6M Not tracked Withheld, no withdrawal wallet
Chips.gg $3.4M $3.5M 104.3%
JackpotBet $803.7K Not tracked Withheld, no withdrawal wallet
Winna $437.0K $425.7K 97.4%

Why This Matters Beyond One Report

This is the same on-chain deposit and withdrawal data behind our instant withdrawal casino rankings, and it’ll keep getting pulled on a regular cadence, so the numbers here won’t be a one-time snapshot. If a casino is missing a payout ratio today because of an untracked withdrawal wallet, we’re actively working to close that gap, and expect it to fill in over future pulls.

Full detail on how we source and gate this data lives on our How We Rate Crypto Casinos page.

Relevant news

Leave a Reply